meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
sector:agriculture:agricultural_soils:3df_agriculture_other [2021/12/01 16:16] – [Table] doering | sector:agriculture:agricultural_soils:3df_agriculture_other [2024/11/06 16:10] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
For the years as of 2000, the specified maximum HCB concentrations in chlorothalonil differ considerably from pesticide to pesticide – in some cases despite the EU-regulation, | For the years as of 2000, the specified maximum HCB concentrations in chlorothalonil differ considerably from pesticide to pesticide – in some cases despite the EU-regulation, | ||
- | According to information from the BVL (October | + | According to information from the BVL (October |
For the years from 2018 onwards, the information from the authorisation holders (Syngenta Agro, 2015) is used for the maximum concentration of 10 mg/kg, as only the product “AMISTAR Opti” was still on the market. | For the years from 2018 onwards, the information from the authorisation holders (Syngenta Agro, 2015) is used for the maximum concentration of 10 mg/kg, as only the product “AMISTAR Opti” was still on the market. | ||
Line 175: | Line 175: | ||
The following chart give an overview of the emission trend of HCB (see Picture 1). HCB emissions were fully recalculated up to 1990. HCB emissions are mainly dominated by the share of chlorothalonil. According to the BVL (2021a), a possible explanation for the increase in HCB emissions from 2005 onwards would be the re-approval of "Bravo 500" in December 2004 against Septoria in wheat and then for the first time against Phytophthora in potatoes. | The following chart give an overview of the emission trend of HCB (see Picture 1). HCB emissions were fully recalculated up to 1990. HCB emissions are mainly dominated by the share of chlorothalonil. According to the BVL (2021a), a possible explanation for the increase in HCB emissions from 2005 onwards would be the re-approval of "Bravo 500" in December 2004 against Septoria in wheat and then for the first time against Phytophthora in potatoes. | ||
It is possible that the first " | It is possible that the first " | ||
- | The end of the EU active substance authorisation for chlorothalonil was later extended to 31.10.2018 and again to 31.10.2019, and with it the authorisations for the plant protection products in Germany. With the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/677 23), the BVL revoked the last three approvals for plant protection products containing chlorothalonil on 31 October 2019. A sell-off period until 30 April 2020 applied((cf. BVL; 2021c: https:// | + | The end of the EU active substance authorisation for chlorothalonil was later extended to 31.10.2018 and again to 31.10.2019, and with it the authorisations for the plant protection products in Germany. With the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/677 23), the BVL revoked the last three approvals for plant protection products containing chlorothalonil on 31 October 2019((cf. BVL; 2019: BVL - Fachmeldungen - Widerruf der Zulassung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln mit dem Wirkstoff Chlorthalonil zum 31. Oktober 2019. (2019, 31. Oktober). Abgerufen am September 2021, von https:// |
//Picture 1: Annual trend of HCB emissions in Germany in the sector agriculture, | //Picture 1: Annual trend of HCB emissions in Germany in the sector agriculture, | ||
- | {{: | + | |
+ | {{ : | ||
Line 186: | Line 187: | ||
===== Recalculations ===== | ===== Recalculations ===== | ||
- | Recalculations were made for the complete time series due to the changes and new information given by the BVL. The following | + | Recalculations were made for the complete time series due to the changes and new information given by the BVL for the amount of domestic sales of the active substances. The following |
- | //Table IV: Recalculation of the activity data: lindane, chlorthalonil and picloram.// | + | //Tables |
- | ^ Active Substance | + | a) |
- | | Lindane_SUB 2022 | t | + | ^ Active Substance |
- | | Lindane_SUB 2021 | t | + | | Lindane_SUB 2022 |
- | | Difference | + | | Lindane_SUB 2021 |
- | | Difference | + | | Difference |
+ | | Difference | ||
- | ^ Active Substance | + | b) |
- | | Chlorthalonil_SUB 2022 | t | 911,8 | | + | ^ Active Substance |
- | | Chlorthalonil_SUB 2021 | t | 860,8 | | + | | Chlorthalonil_SUB 2022 | t |
- | | Difference | + | | Chlorthalonil_SUB 2021 | t |
- | | Difference | + | | Difference |
+ | | Difference | ||
+ | c) | ||
^ Active Substance | ^ Active Substance | ||
| Picloram_SUB 2022 | t | | Picloram_SUB 2022 | t | ||
Line 208: | Line 212: | ||
| Difference | | Difference | ||
+ | Due to the changes in the input data and the assumptions on the maximum quantities of HCB, the emissions also change. The following Table V shows the differences between the data for submission 2021 and the current data and are given in kg per year and in percentage. | ||
+ | |||
+ | //Table V: Recalculation of HCB emisssion from 1990 until the latest reported year, in kg.// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | | Emissions | ||
+ | | HCB_SUB 2022 | kg | 107,2 | 138,1 | 55,7 | 29,7 | 26,7 | 18,0 | 26,6 | 24,2 | 5,0 | 45,0 | | ||
+ | | HCB_SUB 2021 | kg | 107,1 | 138,0 | 55,7 | 29,7 | 26,7 | 18,0 | 26,6 | 24,2 | 5,0 | 45,0 | | ||
+ | | Difference | ||
+ | |||
+ | | Emissions | ||
+ | | HCB_SUB 2022 | kg | 18,6 | 0,8 | 1,0 | 9,6 | 1,6 | 34,3 | 36,2 | 29,6 | 28,8 | 21,0 | | ||
+ | | HCB_SUB 2021 | kg | 18,6 | 0,8 | 1,0 | 9,6 | 1,6 | 11,4 | 12,1 | 9,9 | 9,6 | 5,3 | | ||
+ | | Difference | ||
+ | | Difference | ||
+ | | Difference | ||
+ | |||
+ | | Emissions | ||
+ | | HCB_SUB 2022 | kg | 24,8 | 26,0 | 20,7 | 22,6 | 40,0 | 35,4 | 45,9 | 56,8 | 8,6 | 9,1 | | ||
+ | | HCB_SUB 2021 | kg | 6,3 | 6,7 | 5,5 | 5,8 | 10,2 | 9,0 | 11,7 | 14,4 | 8,8 | 8,8 | | ||
+ | | Difference | ||
+ | | Difference | ||