meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_including_military:military_transport:military_aviation [2021/03/29 19:45] – kotzulla | sector:energy:fuel_combustion:other_including_military:military_transport:military_aviation [2021/05/27 07:50] – [Discussion of emission trends] kotzulla | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
For source category 1.A.5.b, consumption data for **kerosene**, | For source category 1.A.5.b, consumption data for **kerosene**, | ||
- | For the years as of 1995, the official mineral-oil data of the Federal Republic of Germany (Amtliche Mineralöldaten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2012), prepared by the Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (BAFA), are used (BAFA, | + | For the years as of 1995, the official mineral-oil data of the Federal Republic of Germany (Amtliche Mineralöldaten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2012), prepared by the Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (BAFA), are used (BAFA, |
- | As there is no consistent AGEB data availabe for **aviation gasoline**, delivery data from BAFA [((bibcite 1))] is used. | + | As there is no consistent AGEB data availabe for **aviation gasoline**, delivery data from BAFA [(BAFA2020)] is used. |
__Table 1: Sources for consumption data in 1.A.5.b__ | __Table 1: Sources for consumption data in 1.A.5.b__ | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
^ TSP< | ^ TSP< | ||
^ CO | ^ CO | ||
- | < | + | < |
- | < | + | < |
< | < | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
For lead and TSP from leaded avgas, constant tier1 EFs based on the average lead content of AvGas 100 LL are used. | For lead and TSP from leaded avgas, constant tier1 EFs based on the average lead content of AvGas 100 LL are used. | ||
- | > For information on the **emission factors for heavy-metal and POP exhaust emissions**, | + | <WRAP center round info 100%> |
+ | For information on the **emission factors for heavy-metal and POP exhaust emissions**, | ||
+ | </ | ||
===== Discussion of emission trends ===== | ===== Discussion of emission trends ===== | ||
- | > This sub-category | + | <WRAP center round info 60%> |
+ | As only NFR 1.A.5.b as a whole is taken into account within the key category analysis, this country-specific | ||
+ | </ | ||
Due to the application of very several tier1 emission factors, most emission trends reported for this sub-category only reflect the trend in fuel deliveries. | Due to the application of very several tier1 emission factors, most emission trends reported for this sub-category only reflect the trend in fuel deliveries. | ||
Line 83: | Line 88: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | Here, as the EF(BC) are estimated via fractions provided in [((bibcite 3))], black carbon emissions follow the corresponding emissions of PM,,2.5,,. | + | Here, as the EF(BC) are estimated via fractions provided in [((bibcite 3))], black carbon emissions follow the corresponding emissions of PM<sub>2.5</ |
Nonetheless, | Nonetheless, | ||
Line 108: | Line 113: | ||
===== Planned improvements ===== | ===== Planned improvements ===== | ||
- | > There are no sub-sector | + | There are no specific improvements planned at the moment. |
- | === FAQs === | + | ===== FAQs ===== |
//**What is the reason for the big jumps in the consumption of aviation gasoline in 2006 & '07 and the zero-consumption in 2008?**// | //**What is the reason for the big jumps in the consumption of aviation gasoline in 2006 & '07 and the zero-consumption in 2008?**// | ||
Line 129: | Line 134: | ||
The TSP emissions calculated depend directly on the reported lead emissions: The emission factor for TSP is 1.6 times the emission factor used for lead: EF(TSP) = 1.6 x EF(Pb). - The applied procedure is similar to the one used for calculating TSP emissions from leaded gasoline used in road transport. | The TSP emissions calculated depend directly on the reported lead emissions: The emission factor for TSP is 1.6 times the emission factor used for lead: EF(TSP) = 1.6 x EF(Pb). - The applied procedure is similar to the one used for calculating TSP emissions from leaded gasoline used in road transport. | ||
- | **//Why does the party report TSP emissions from leaded avgas, but no such PM,,2.5,, or PM,,10,, emissions?// | + | **//Why does the party report TSP emissions from leaded avgas, but no such PM<sub>2.5</ |
- | The EF(TSP) is estimated from the EF(Pb) which has been calculated from the lead content of Avgas 100 LL. There is no information on the percetual shares of PM,,2.5,, & PM,,10,, in the reported TSP and therefore no EF(PM,,2.5,,) & EF(PM,,10,,) were deducted. | + | The EF(TSP) is estimated from the EF(Pb) which has been calculated from the lead content of Avgas 100 LL. There is no information on the percetual shares of PM<sub>2.5</ |
**//Why are similar EF applied for estimating exhaust heavy metal emissions from both fossil and biofuels?// | **//Why are similar EF applied for estimating exhaust heavy metal emissions from both fossil and biofuels?// | ||
Line 137: | Line 142: | ||
The EF provided in [((bibcite 3))] represent summatory values for (i) the fuel's and (ii) the lubricant' | The EF provided in [((bibcite 3))] represent summatory values for (i) the fuel's and (ii) the lubricant' | ||
- | ------ | + | [(AGEB2020> |
- | + | [(BAFA2020> | |
- | [[bibliography]] | + | URL: https:// |
- | : 1 : BAFA, 2019: Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle, | + | [(KNOERR2020b> |
- | URL: https:// | + | [(EMEPEEA2019> |
- | : 2 : AGEB, 2019: Working Group on Energy | + | [(RENTZ2008> |
- | : 3: EMEP/EEA, 2019: EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019, Copenhagen, 2019. | + | [(KNOERR2009> |
- | : 4 : IZT, 2007: Joerß, W. et al.: Emissionen und Maßnahmenanalyse Feinstaub 2000 – 2020, Institut für Zukunftsstudien und Technologiebewertung (IZT), Berlin, Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes, | + | [(IZT2007> |
- | [[/ | + |