meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sector:agriculture:agricultural_soils:start [2021/12/25 15:05] – [Trend discussion for Key Sources] doeringsector:agriculture:agricultural_soils:start [2022/09/19 07:56] (current) – Fix link hausmann
Line 15: Line 15:
 | [[3Df_Agriculture other|3.D.f]]                                                                                            | Agriculture other including use of pesticides                                                          | T2 (HCB)                                          | NS      | D                                        |                            | | [[3Df_Agriculture other|3.D.f]]                                                                                            | Agriculture other including use of pesticides                                                          | T2 (HCB)                                          | NS      | D                                        |                            |
  
-^  Key Category  ^  SO₂     ^  NOₓ  ^  NH₃  ^  NMVOC  ^  CO   ^  BC   ^  Pb   ^  Hg   ^  Cd   ^  Diox  ^  PAH  ^  HCB  ^  TSP  ^  PM₁₀  ^  PM₂ ₅  ^ +^  Key Category  ^  NO<sub>x</sub>  ^  NMVOC  ^  SO<sub>2</sub>  ^  NH<sub>3</sub>  ^  PM<sub>2.5</sub>  ^  PM<sub>10</sub>  ^  TSP  ^  BC  ^  CO  ^  Pb  ^  Cd  ^  Hg  ^  Diox  ^  PAH  ^  HCB  ^ 
-| 3.D.a.1         |  -          |  L/-  |  L/T  |  -      |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -      +| 3.D.a.1        |  L/            |  -       -               |  L/T             |  -                 |  -                |  -    |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -     |  -    |  -    
-| 3.D.a.2.a       |  -          |  L/-  |  L/T  |  -      |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -      +| 3.D.a.2.a      |  L/            |  -       -               |  L/T             |  -                 |  -                |  -    |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -     |  -    |  -    
-| 3.D.a.2.b       |  -          |  -/-   -/-  |  -      |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -      +| 3.D.a.2.b      |  -/-             |  -       -               |  -/-             |  -                 |  -                |  -    |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -     |  -    |  -    
-| 3.D.a.2.c       |  -          |  -/-   L/T  |  -      |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -      +| 3.D.a.2.c      |  -/-             |  -       -               |  L/T             |  -                 |  -                |  -    |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -     |  -    |  -    
-| 3.D.a.3         |  -          |  -/-   -/-  |  -      |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -      +| 3.D.a.3        |  -/-             |  -       -               |  -/-             |  -                 |  -                |  -    |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -     |  -    |  -    
-| 3.D.c           |  -          |  -    |  -    |  -      |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -    |  -    |  L/ |  L/  |  -/-    | +| 3.D.c          |  -               |  -      |  -               |  -               |  -/-               |  L/             |  L/ |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -     |  -    |  -    | 
-| 3.D.e           |  -          |  -    |  -    |  -/-    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -      +| 3.D.e          |  -               |  -/-    |  -               |  -               |  -                 |  -                |  -    |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -     |  -    |  -    
-| 3.D.f           |  -          |  -    |  -    |  -      |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -    |  -     |  -    |  L/-  |  -    |  -     |  -      |+| 3.D.f          |  -               |  -      |  -               |  -               |  -                 |  -                |  -    |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -   |  -     |  -    |  L/-  |
  {{page>general:Misc:LegendEIT:start}}  {{page>general:Misc:LegendEIT:start}}
 \\ \\
Line 48: Line 48:
  
 =====3.D.a.1 - Inorganic N-fertilizers ===== =====3.D.a.1 - Inorganic N-fertilizers =====
-The calculation of NH<sub>3</sub> and NOx (NO) emissions from the application of inorganic fertilizers is described in Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 11.1 ((Vos et al. (2022): Vos C., Rösemann C., Haenel H-D., Dämmgen U., Döring U., Wulf S., Eurich-Menden B., Freibauer A., Döhler H., Schreiner C., Osterburg B. & FußR(2022)Calculations of gaseous and particulate emissions from German Agriculture 1990 –2020Report on methods and data (RMD)Submission 2022. Thünen Report (in preparation). https://www.thuenen.de/de/ak/arbeitsbereiche/emissionsinventare/)).+The calculation of NH<sub>3</sub> and NOx (NO) emissions from the application of inorganic fertilizers is described in Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 11.1 ((Vos C, Rösemann C, Haenel H-D, Dämmgen U, Döring U, Wulf S, Eurich-Menden B, Freibauer A, Döhler H, Schreiner C, Osterburg BFuß R (2022) Calculations of gaseous and particulate emissions from German agriculture 1990 – 2020 Report on methods and data (RMD) Submission 2022. Braunschweig: Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, 452 p, Thünen Rep 91, DOI:10.3220/REP1646725833000. https://www.thuenen.de/de/fachinstitute/agrarklimaschutz/arbeitsbereiche/emissionsinventare)).
  
 ==== Activity Data ==== ==== Activity Data ====
Line 146: Line 146:
  
 ==== Recalculations ==== ==== Recalculations ====
-Table REC-2 shows the effects of recalculations on NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> .The total emissions of NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub>  from application of manure are significantly lower than those of last year’s submission. These differences are predominantly caused by the update of the models of dairy cowscalves, heifers and male beef cattle, see [[sector:agriculture:start|main page of the agricultural sector]], list of **recalculation reasons, No. 1 through 3**. Much smaller is the impact of the updates of activity data for male cattle years, pigs, poultry and sheep (see **recalculation reasons 4, 6, 7, and 9 through 12**) as well as the update of activity data for air scrubbing systems in pig and broiler houses (see **recalculation reasons 8 and 10**). Further details on recalculations are described in Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 3.5.2.+Table REC-2 shows the effects of recalculations on NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub>.The total emissions of NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> from application of manure are slightly lower than those of last year’s submission from the year 2000 onwards for NH<sub>3</sub>from the year 2010 onwards for NO<sub>x</sub>. In earlier years the emissions are slightly higher than in last year’s submission
  
 +These differences are predominantly caused by the update of data from the official agricultural census 2020 as well as the update of the suckler-cow model and the new raw protein contents in feed of fattening pigs and broilers, see [[sector:agriculture:start|main page of the agricultural sector]], list of **recalculation reasons, No. 1, 4, 7 and 8**. 
  
-//Table REC-2: Comparison of the NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions of the submissions (SUB) 2020 and 2021//+Much smaller is the impact of the updates of activity data for male cattle > 2 years, pigs, poultry and sheep (see **recalculation reasons 5, 6 and 9 through 12**) Further details on recalculations are described in Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 3.5.2. 
 + 
 + 
 +//Table REC-2: Comparison of the NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions of the submissions (SUB) 2021 and 2022//
  
 ^  NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from application of manure, in Gg                                                                                                                                                ||||||||||||||||| ^  NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from application of manure, in Gg                                                                                                                                                |||||||||||||||||
Line 163: Line 167:
  
 ===== 3.D.a.2.b – Sewage sludge applied to soils ===== ===== 3.D.a.2.b – Sewage sludge applied to soils =====
-The calculation of NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> (NO) emissions from application of sewage sludge is described in Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 11.4.+The calculation of NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> (NO) emissions from application of sewage sludge is described in Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 11.4.
  
 ==== Activity data ==== ==== Activity data ====
Line 185: Line 189:
  
 ==== Recalculations ==== ==== Recalculations ====
-Table REC-3 shows the effects of recalculations on NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions. The only change compared to last year’s submission occurs for the year 2018, due to the update of the activity data (see [[sector:agriculture:start|main page of the agricultural sector]], **recalculation No 14**. Further details on recalculations are described in Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 3.5.2. 
  
-//Table REC-3: Comparison of the NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions of the submissions (SUB) 2020 and 2021//+Table REC-3 shows the effects of recalculations on NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions. The only change compared to last year’s submission occurs for the year 2018 and 2019 due to the update of the activity data (see [[sector:agriculture:start|main page of the agricultural sector]], **recalculation No 15**. Further details on recalculations are described in Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 3.5.2. 
 + 
 +//Table REC-3: Comparison of the NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions of the submissions (SUB) 2021 and 2022//
  
 ^ NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from application of sewage sludge, in Gg                                                                                                                                 ||||||||||||||||| ^ NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from application of sewage sludge, in Gg                                                                                                                                 |||||||||||||||||
Line 200: Line 205:
  
 ===== 3.D.a.2.c - Other organic fertilizers applied to soils ===== ===== 3.D.a.2.c - Other organic fertilizers applied to soils =====
-This sub category describes Germany’s NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> (NO) emissions from application of residues from digested energy crops. For details see Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapters 10.2 and 11.3.+This sub category describes Germany’s NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> (NO) emissions from application of residues from digested energy crops. For details see Vos et al. (2022), Chapters 10.2 and 11.3.
  
 ==== Activity data ==== ==== Activity data ====
-Activity data is the amount of N in residues from anaerobic digestion of energy crops when leaving storage. This amount of N is the N contained in the energy crops when being fed into the digestion process minus the N losses by emissions of N species from the storage of the residues (see 3.I). N losses from pre-storage are negligible and there are no N losses from fermenter (see Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 10.2.1).+Activity data is the amount of N in residues from anaerobic digestion of energy crops when leaving storage. This amount of N is the N contained in the energy crops when being fed into the digestion process minus the N losses by emissions of N species from the storage of the residues (see 3.I). N losses from pre-storage are negligible and there are no N losses from fermenter (see Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 10.2.1).
  
 //Table 7: AD for the estimation of NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from application of residues from anaerobic digestion of energy crops// //Table 7: AD for the estimation of NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from application of residues from anaerobic digestion of energy crops//
Line 212: Line 217:
  
 ==== Methodology ==== ==== Methodology ====
-The NH<sub>3</sub> emissions are calculated the same way as the NH<sub>3</sub> emissions from application of animal manure (3.D.a.2.a). The frequencies of application techniques and incorporation times as well as the underlying data sources are provided e. g. in the NIR 2021, Chapter 19.3.2. The amounts of TAN in the residues applied are obtained from the calculations of emissions from the storage of the digested energy crops (3.I).+The NH<sub>3</sub> emissions are calculated the same way as the NH<sub>3</sub> emissions from application of animal manure (3.D.a.2.a). The frequencies of application techniques and incorporation times as well as the underlying data sources are provided e. g. in the NIR 2022, Chapter 19.3.2. The amounts of TAN in the residues applied are obtained from the calculations of emissions from the storage of the digested energy crops (3.I).
  
 For NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from application of residues the Tier 1 approach for the application of inorganic fertilizer as described in EMEP (2019)-3D-11 is used. The inventory calculates NO emissions that are subsequently converted into NO<sub>x</sub> emissions by multiplying with the molar weight ratio 46/30. For NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from application of residues the Tier 1 approach for the application of inorganic fertilizer as described in EMEP (2019)-3D-11 is used. The inventory calculates NO emissions that are subsequently converted into NO<sub>x</sub> emissions by multiplying with the molar weight ratio 46/30.
  
 ==== Emission factors ==== ==== Emission factors ====
-For NH<sub>3</sub> the emission factors for untreated cattle slurry were adopted, see Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 10.2. As the NO<sub>x</sub> method for fertilizer application is used for the calculation of NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from the application of residues, the emission factor for fertilizer application was used (see Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 11.1)+For NH<sub>3</sub> the emission factors for untreated cattle slurry were adopted, see Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 10.2. As the NO<sub>x</sub> method for fertilizer application is used for the calculation of NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from the application of residues, the emission factor for fertilizer application was used (see Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 11.1)
  
 Table 8 shows the implied emission factors for NH<sub>3</sub> emissions from application of residues from digested energy crops. Table 8 shows the implied emission factors for NH<sub>3</sub> emissions from application of residues from digested energy crops.
Line 231: Line 236:
  
 ==== Recalculations ==== ==== Recalculations ====
-Table REC-4 shows the effects of recalculations on NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions. The only change compared to last year’s submission occurs for 2018, due to the update of the activity data (see [[sector:agriculture:start|main page of the agricultural sector]], list of **recalculation reasons, No 15**, and Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 3.5.2.) 
  
-//Table REC-4: Comparison of the NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions of the submissions (SUB) 2020 and 2021//+Table REC-4 shows the effects of recalculations on NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions. The only changes compared to last year’s submission occur for the years 2015-2019, due to the use of new data on manure spreading techniques from the official agricultural census 2020 (see [[sector:agriculture:start|main page of the agricultural sector]], list of **recalculation reasons, No 1 and 16**, and Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 3.5.2.) 
 + 
 +//Table REC-4: Comparison of the NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions of the submissions (SUB) 2021 and 2022// 
 ^ NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from application of digested energy crops, in Gg                                                                                                                                  ||||||||||||||||| ^ NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from application of digested energy crops, in Gg                                                                                                                                  |||||||||||||||||
 ^                                                                                                SUB    1990  ^  1995  ^  2000  ^  2005  ^  2010  ^  2011  ^  2012  ^  2013  ^  2014  ^  2015  ^  2016  ^  2017  ^  2018  ^  2019  ^  2020  ^ ^                                                                                                SUB    1990  ^  1995  ^  2000  ^  2005  ^  2010  ^  2011  ^  2012  ^  2013  ^  2014  ^  2015  ^  2016  ^  2017  ^  2018  ^  2019  ^  2020  ^
Line 246: Line 253:
  
 =====  3.D.a.3 - Urine and dung deposited by grazing animals ===== =====  3.D.a.3 - Urine and dung deposited by grazing animals =====
-The calculation of NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> (NO) emissions from N excretions on pasture is described in Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 11.5.+The calculation of NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> (NO) emissions from N excretions on pasture is described in Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 11.5.
  
 ==== Activity data ==== ==== Activity data ====
Line 282: Line 289:
  
 ==== Recalculations ==== ==== Recalculations ====
-Table REC-5 shows the effects of recalculations on NH<sub>3</sub> and NOx emissions. Because overall N excretions on pasture are lower than in last year’s submission (predominantly due to the update of cattle models, see [[sector:agriculture:start|main page of the agricultural sector]], list of **recalculation reasons, No 1 through 3**), NO<sub>x</sub> emissions are lower as well. However, although NH<sub>3</sub> emissions could be expected to show the same pattern, this is more than compensated by increased emission factors for cattle grazing (see list of **recalculation reasons, No 5**). Further details on recalculations are described in Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 3.5.2.+Table REC-5 shows the effects of recalculations on NH<sub>3</sub> and NOx emissions.  
 + 
 +Because overall N excretions on pasture are lower than in last year’s submission for dairy cattle, but higher for other cattle (predominantly due to new cattle grazing data from the official agricultural census 2020 and the update of the suckler-cow models, see [[sector:agriculture:start|main page of the agricultural sector]], list of **recalculation reasons, No 1 and 2**), NO<sub>x</sub> emissions are lower than in last year’s submission. However, although NH<sub>3</sub> emissions could be expected to show the same pattern, they are slightly higher than in the last submission in 1990-2013 and slightly lower than in last year’s submission from 2014 onwards. This is due to a combination of two effects: The TAN content of the suckler cows’ N-excretions is higher in the new suckler-cow model, which leads to higher emissions over the whole time series. This is over-compensated by declining dairy cow grazing times from 2014 onwards, which leads to lower emissions (see list of **recalculation reasons, No 1 and 2**). Further details on recalculations are described in Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 3.5.2. 
 + 
 +//Table REC-5: Comparison of the NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions of the submissions (SUB) 2021 and 2022//
  
-//Table REC-5: Comparison of the NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions of the submissions (SUB) 2020 and 2021// 
 ^ NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from grazing, in Gg                                                                                                                                 ||||||||||||||||| ^ NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions from grazing, in Gg                                                                                                                                 |||||||||||||||||
 ^                                                                  ^  SUB  ^  1990  ^  1995  ^  2000  ^  2005  ^  2010  ^  2011  ^  2012  ^  2013  ^  2014  ^  2015  ^  2016  ^  2017  ^  2018  ^  2019  ^  2020  ^ ^                                                                  ^  SUB  ^  1990  ^  1995  ^  2000  ^  2005  ^  2010  ^  2011  ^  2012  ^  2013  ^  2014  ^  2015  ^  2016  ^  2017  ^  2018  ^  2019  ^  2020  ^
Line 296: Line 306:
  
 ===== 3.D.c - Farm-level agricultural operations including storage, handling and transport of agricultural products ===== ===== 3.D.c - Farm-level agricultural operations including storage, handling and transport of agricultural products =====
-In this category Germany reports TSP, PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from crop production according to EMEP (2019)-3D-11. For details see Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 11.14.+In this category Germany reports TSP, PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from crop production according to EMEP (2019)-3D-11. For details see Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 11.14.
  
 ==== Activity data ==== ==== Activity data ====
Line 325: Line 335:
  
 ==== Recalculations ==== ==== Recalculations ====
-Table REC-6 shows the effects of recalculations on particulate matter emissions. The only changes with respect to last year’s submission occur in the years 2010 through 2012 because of updates of cultivation areas (see [[sector:agriculture:start|main page of the agricultural sector]], list of **recalculation reasons, No 16**). However, due to the data format in Table REC-6, these differences are not visible. Further details on recalculations are described in Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 3.5.2.+Table REC-6 shows the effects of recalculations on particulate matter emissions. There are minor changes with respect to last year’s submission in several years because of updates of cultivation areas (see [[sector:agriculture:start|main page of the agricultural sector]], list of **recalculation reasons, No 17**). However, due to the data format in Table REC-6, these differences are not visible. Further details on recalculations are described in Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 3.5.2.
  
-//Table REC-6: Comparison of particle emissions (TSP, PM<sub>10</sub> & PM<sub>2.5</sub>) of the submissions (SUB) 2020 and 2021//+//Table REC-6: Comparison of particle emissions (TSP, PM<sub>10</sub> & PM<sub>2.5</sub>) of the submissions (SUB) 2021 and 2022//
  
 ^ TSP, PM<sub>10</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from crop production, in Gg                                                                                                                                 ||||||||||||||||| ^ TSP, PM<sub>10</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions from crop production, in Gg                                                                                                                                 |||||||||||||||||
Line 344: Line 354:
  
 =====  3.D.e - Cultivated crops ===== =====  3.D.e - Cultivated crops =====
-In this category Germany reports NMVOC emissions from crop production according to EMEP (2019)-3D-16. For details see Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 11.12.+In this category Germany reports NMVOC emissions from crop production according to EMEP (2019)-3D-16. For details see Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 11.12.
  
 ==== Activity data ==== ==== Activity data ====
Line 368: Line 378:
  
 ==== Trend discussion for Key Sources ==== ==== Trend discussion for Key Sources ====
-Emissions from urine and dung deposited by grazing animals are no key sources.+NMVOC emissions from crop production are no key sources.
  
 ==== Recalculations ==== ==== Recalculations ====
-Table REC-7 shows the effects of recalculations on NMVOC emissions. The only changes with respect to last year’s submission occur in the years 1999 (not shown in Table REC-7) and 2010 through 2012 because of updates of yields in 1999 and 2010 and of cultivation areas 2010 through 2012 (see [[sector:agriculture:start|main page of the agricultural sector]], list of **recalculation reasons, No 16**). However, due to the data format in Table Table REC-6, these differences are not visible. Further details on recalculations are described in Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 3.5.2.+Table REC-7 shows the effects of recalculations on NMVOC emissions. There are minor changes with respect to last year’s submission in seral years because of updates of yields (see [[sector:agriculture:start|main page of the agricultural sector]], list of **recalculation reasons, No 17**). However, due to the data format in Table Table REC-6, these differences are not visible. Further details on recalculations are described in Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 3.5.2.
  
  
-//Table REC-7: Comparison of NMVOC emissions of the submissions (SUB) 2020 and 2021//+//Table REC-7: Comparison of NMVOC emissions of the submissions (SUB) 2021 and 2022//
  
 ^ NMVOC emissions from crop production, in Gg                                                                                                                          |||||||||||||||| ^ NMVOC emissions from crop production, in Gg                                                                                                                          ||||||||||||||||
Line 381: Line 391:
 | **2021**                                       7.69 |   8.19 |   8.79 |   9.17 |   9.53 |   9.03 |  10.05 |  10.36 |  11.40 |   9.91 |   9.69 |   9.74 |   7.82 |   8.56 |        | | **2021**                                       7.69 |   8.19 |   8.79 |   9.17 |   9.53 |   9.03 |  10.05 |  10.36 |  11.40 |   9.91 |   9.69 |   9.74 |   7.82 |   8.56 |        |
  
 +<WRAP center round info 60%> 
 +For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2019**, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following [[general:recalculations:start|chapter 8.1 - Recalculations]]. 
 +</WRAP>
 ==== Planned improvements ==== ==== Planned improvements ====
 No improvements are planned at present. No improvements are planned at present.
  
 ==== Uncertainty ==== ==== Uncertainty ====
-Details will be described in [[general:uncertainty_evaluation:start|chapter 1.7]].+Details are described in [[general:uncertainty_evaluation:start|chapter 1.7]].