meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| sector:agriculture:manure_management:start [2021/12/25 11:40] – [TSP, PM10 and PM2.5] doering | sector:agriculture:manure_management:start [2022/09/15 13:44] (current) – [Country specifics] Fix link hausmann | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| | 3.B.4.h | | 3.B.4.h | ||
| - | ^ Key Category | + | ^ Key Category |
| - | | 3.B.1.a | + | | 3.B.1.a |
| - | | 3.B.1.b | + | | 3.B.1.b |
| - | | 3.B.2 | + | | 3.B.2 | -/- | -/- |
| - | | 3.B.3 | + | | 3.B.3 | -/- | -/- |
| - | | 3.B.4.d | + | | 3.B.4.d |
| - | | 3.B.4.e | + | | 3.B.4.e |
| - | | 3.B.4.g.i | + | | 3.B.4.g.i |
| - | | 3.B.4.g.ii | + | | 3.B.4.g.ii |
| - | | 3.B.4.g.iii | + | | 3.B.4.g.iii |
| - | | 3.B.4.g.iv | + | | 3.B.4.g.iv |
| | | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| - | NO< | + | NO< |
| NMVOC emissions from category 3.B (manure management) contributed 96.9 % (289.8 kt) from total agricultural NMVOC emissions (298.9 kt). | NMVOC emissions from category 3.B (manure management) contributed 96.9 % (289.8 kt) from total agricultural NMVOC emissions (298.9 kt). | ||
| Line 310: | Line 310: | ||
| ==== Method ==== | ==== Method ==== | ||
| - | EMEP (2013)-3B-26 | + | EMEP (2013-3B-26) provided a Tier 2 methodology. In the current Guidebook (EMEP, 2019), this methodology has been replaced by a Tier 1 methodology. However, EF for cattle derived with the EMEP 2013 Tier 2 methodology remained unchanged. |
| - | The inventory considers air scrubber systems in swine and poultry husbandry. For animal places equipped with air scrubbing the emission factors are reduced according to the removal efficiency of the air scrubber systems (90 % for TSP and PM< | + | The inventory considers air scrubber systems in swine and poultry husbandry. For animal places equipped with air scrubbing the emission factors are reduced according to the removal efficiency of the air scrubber systems (90 % for TSP and PM< |
| === Activity data === | === Activity data === | ||
| Line 317: | Line 317: | ||
| === Emission factors === | === Emission factors === | ||
| - | Tier 1 emission factors for TSP, PM< | + | Tier 1 emission factors for TSP, PM< |
| The implied emission factors given in Table 5 relate the overall TSP and PM emissions to the number of animals in each animal category. The Guidebook does not indicate whether EFs have considered the condensable component (with or without). | The implied emission factors given in Table 5 relate the overall TSP and PM emissions to the number of animals in each animal category. The Guidebook does not indicate whether EFs have considered the condensable component (with or without). | ||
| Line 365: | Line 365: | ||
| ==== Trend discussion for Key Sources ==== | ==== Trend discussion for Key Sources ==== | ||
| - | Swine and laying hens are key sources of TSP emissions from manure management. The total TSP emissions from swine mainly follow the animal numbers given in Table 1. However, due to air scrubbing and different emission factors of the different housing systems of the four swine subcategories (sows with piglets, weaners, fattening pigs, boars) and the varying population shares in those housing systems the R< | + | Swine and laying hens are key sources of TSP emissions from manure management. The total TSP emissions from swine mainly follow the animal numbers given in Table 1. However, due to air scrubbing and different emission factors of the different housing systems of the four swine subcategories (sows with piglets, weaners, fattening pigs, boars) and the varying population shares in those housing systems the R< |
| ==== Recalculations ==== | ==== Recalculations ==== | ||
| - | Table REC-4 shows the effects of recalculations on emissions of particulate matter. Changes in the years 1990 through | + | Table REC-4 shows the effects of recalculations on emissions of particulate matter. Changes in the years 2000 through |
| - | //Table REC-4: Comparison of particle emissions (TSP, PM< | + | //Table REC-4: Comparison of particle emissions (TSP, PM< |
| ^ TSP, PM10, PM2.5 emissions from manure management, in Gg ||||||||||||||||| | ^ TSP, PM10, PM2.5 emissions from manure management, in Gg ||||||||||||||||| | ||
| Line 381: | Line 381: | ||
| ^ PM< | ^ PM< | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 60%> | ||
| + | For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2019**, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following [[general: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| ===== Planned improvements ===== | ===== Planned improvements ===== | ||
| No improvements are planned at present. | No improvements are planned at present. | ||