meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
sector:agriculture:start [2021/12/23 07:53] – [Mitigation measures] doering | sector:agriculture:start [2021/12/23 07:58] – [Recalculations and reasons] doering | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
- | ===== Recalculations and reasons | + | ===== Reasons for recalculations |
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
The following list summarizes, the most important reasons for recalculations. Recalculations result from improvements in input data and methodologies (for details see Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 3.5.2). | The following list summarizes, the most important reasons for recalculations. Recalculations result from improvements in input data and methodologies (for details see Rösemann et al. (2021), Chapter 3.5.2). | ||
- | 1) Dairy cows and calves: Adjustment of initial weight, energy requirements and feeding according to German expert recommendations; | + | The following list summarizes the most important reasons for recalculations. Recalculations result from improvements in input data and methodologies (for details see Vos et al. (2022), Chapter 3.5.2). |
- | 2) Heifers: Subdivision into dairy and slaughter heifers with different final weights; adaptation | + | 1) Incorporation |
- | 3) Male beef cattle: Adjustment of feeding according to German expert recommendations; | + | 2) Dairy cows: Update |
- | 4) Male cattle > 2 years: update (increase) of the amount | + | 3) Heifers: Minor changes in the nutrient content |
- | 5) Cattle grazing: The NH< | + | 4) Suckler cows: modeling of the energy requirement and feed intake has been updated |
- | 6) Sows: Update of the number of piglets per sow in 2018. | + | 5) Male cattle > 2 years: Update of weights from 1999 onwards. |
- | 7) Fattening pigs and weaners: Update of animal numbers, starting weights and final weights for 2018. | + | 6) Sows: Update of the number of piglets per sow in 2019. |
- | 8) All pigs except boars: Update of activity | + | 7) Fattening |
- | 9) Sheep, laying hens, broilers, pullets: | + | 8) Broilers: New data on raw protein content, ash content and digestibility of feed from 2000 onwards. |
- | 10) Broilers: Update of the national gross production of broiler meat in 2018; update of activity data of air scrubbing systems in broiler housings from 2013 onwards. | + | 9) Turkeys: Update of input data (slaughter weight, weight gain and feed conversion coefficient) for the years 2017-2019. |
- | 11) Turkeys: Recalculation | + | 10) Geese: update (increase) |
- | 12) Anaerobic digestion of animal manures: Update | + | 11) Laying hens: Improved interpolation |
+ | |||
+ | 12) Pullets: Improved interpolation | ||
- | 13) Mineral fertilizers, | + | 13) Anaerobic digestion |
+ | |||
+ | 14) Mineral fertilizers: | ||
- | 14) Application of sewage sludge to soils: Update of activity data in 2018. | + | 15) Application of sewage sludge to soils: Update of activity data in 2018 and 2019. Minor corrections of activity data in one federal state for the whole time series. |
- | 15) Anaerobic digestion of energy crops: Update of activity data in 2018. | + | 16) Anaerobic digestion of energy crops: Update of activity data in 2019. |
+ | |||
+ | 17) Soils: Minor corrections of cultivated areas and yields in several years. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 18) Pesticides: Recalculations were made for the complete time series due to the changes and new information given by the BVL for the amount of domestic sales of the active substances Lindane (1990 – 1997), Chlorothalonil and Picloram (2019) and the maximum amount of HCB in the active substance Chlorothalonil of the FAO specification was used for the calculation in the period 2005 - 2017. | ||
- | 16) Crop residues: Minor corrections of cultivated areas and yields in the years 1999 and 2010 through 2012. | ||