meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
sector:ippu:metal_production:iron_and_steel_production:start [2022/06/20 21:37] – [Planned improvements] reichel | sector:ippu:metal_production:iron_and_steel_production:start [2022/06/20 22:01] – [Method] reichel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| PM< | | PM< | ||
| PM< | | PM< | ||
+ | |||
__Table 2: Overview of the emission factors applied for pig iron production__ | __Table 2: Overview of the emission factors applied for pig iron production__ | ||
Line 89: | Line 90: | ||
| PM< | | PM< | ||
- | For **sinter production**, | ||
__Table 3: Overview of the emission factors applied for oxygen steel production__ | __Table 3: Overview of the emission factors applied for oxygen steel production__ | ||
Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
+ | **HCB** | ||
+ | |||
+ | For **sinter production**, | ||
+ | |||
+ | **PAH** | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the 2021 review the application of a consistent methodology in reporting of PAH emissions in 2C1-iron and steel production was claimed. As there is not enough data available to report individual PAHs Germany implemented with the submission 2022 the recommendation to only report total-PAHs for the whole time series. Therefore a national total-PAH emission factor for pig iron production needed to be deduced. | ||
=====Discussion of emission trends===== | =====Discussion of emission trends===== | ||