meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
sector:ippu:mineral_industry:lime_production:start [2021/12/21 09:27] – [Table] kludt | sector:ippu:mineral_industry:lime_production:start [2022/02/23 15:05] – [Table] kuntze | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
===== Short description ===== | ===== Short description ===== | ||
- | ^ Category Code ^ Method | + | ^ Category Code ^ Method |
- | | 2.A.2 | T1 ||||| AS ||||| CS ||||| | + | | 2.A.2 | T1 ||||| AS ||||| CS |
- | ^ Key Category | + | ^ Key Category |
- | | 2.A.2 | + | | 2.A.2 | -/- |
{{page> | {{page> | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==== Emission factors ==== | ==== Emission factors ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Due to recommendation during NEC-Review 2021 the calculation of CO emissions from lime production is allocated to process emissions based on default-EF. The other EF are country-specific values from different research projects. | ||
__Table 1: Emission factors for quick-lime production__ | __Table 1: Emission factors for quick-lime production__ | ||
- | ^ pollutant | + | ^ pollutant |
- | ^ NOₓ | + | ^ NO< |
- | ^ SO₂ | + | ^ SO< |
- | | | | + | ^ NMVOC | quicklime |
- | ^ NMVOC | + | ^ CO | quicklime |
- | ^ TSP || quicklime | + | ^ TSP | quicklime |
- | ^ PM₁₀ | + | ^ PM< |
- | ^ PM₂.₅ || quicklime | + | ^ PM< |
- | ^ Hg | + | ^ Hg | quicklime |
__Table 2: Emission factors for dolomite production__ | __Table 2: Emission factors for dolomite production__ | ||
- | ^ pollutant | + | ^ pollutant |
- | ^ NOₓ || dolomite | + | ^ NO< |
- | ^ SO₂ || dolomite | + | ^ SO< |
- | ^ NMVOC || dolomite | + | ^ NMVOC | dolomite |
- | ^ TSP || dolomite | + | ^ CO | dolomite |
- | ^ PM₁₀ | + | ^ TSP | dolomite |
- | ^ PM₂.₅ || dolomite | + | ^ PM< |
- | ^ Hg || quicklime | + | ^ PM< |
+ | ^ Hg | quicklime | ||
Line 54: | Line 57: | ||
=====Recalculations===== | =====Recalculations===== | ||
- | With **activity data** and **emission factors** remaining unrevised, no recalculations have been carried out compared to last year's submission. | + | With **activity data** and all already used **emission factors** remaining unrevised, no recalculations have been carried out compared to last year's submission |
+ | But due to recommendation during NEC-Review 2021 the calculation of CO emissions from lime production is allocated to process emissions and first time estimated and reported here. So emission trend shows the recalculation in total. | ||
<WRAP center round info 60%> | <WRAP center round info 60%> | ||
- | For pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2018, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following [[general: | + | For pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2019, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following [[general: |
</ | </ | ||