meta data for this page
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
sector:waste:open_burning:start [2021/04/27 14:17] – review result kludt | sector:waste:open_burning:start [2022/03/22 08:14] – [Recalculations] kotzulla | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== 5.C.2 - Open Burning of Waste ====== | ====== 5.C.2 - Open Burning of Waste ====== | ||
- | ^ Category Code ^ Method | + | ^ Category Code ^ Method |
- | | 5.C.2 | CS ||||| Q ||||| D, CS ||||| | + | | 5.C.2 | CS |
- | ^ | + | ^ |
- | | 5.C.2 | -/- | -/- | - | -/- | + | | Key Category: |
| | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Please see chapter regarding farming/ | Please see chapter regarding farming/ | ||
- | Emissions from open burning of wood and green waste for traditional purposes, so-called bonfires such as Easter fires, are reported model-based. In addition to biogenic carbon dioxide, emissions of NOx, SO2, CO, NMVOC, particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10 and TSP) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) are covered so far. | + | Emissions from open burning of wood and green waste for traditional purposes, so-called bonfires such as Easter fires, are reported model-based. In addition to biogenic carbon dioxide, emissions of NOx, SO2, CO, NMVOC, particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10 and TSP), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) |
\\ | \\ | ||
=====Method===== | =====Method===== | ||
- | For developing of a estimation frame a survey regarding the number of such bonfires was carried out by an expert work ((Wagner & Steinmetzer, | + | For developing of a estimation frame a survey regarding the number of such bonfires was carried out by an expert work [(Wagner & Steinmetzer, |
As discussed on Review 2020 regarding all relevant sources: A comparison shows that the volume of bonfires is significantly higher than the volume of campfires. In terms of number, however, the two types of fires are similar. Due to the large fluctuations of the minimum/ | As discussed on Review 2020 regarding all relevant sources: A comparison shows that the volume of bonfires is significantly higher than the volume of campfires. In terms of number, however, the two types of fires are similar. Due to the large fluctuations of the minimum/ | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
====Activity data==== | ====Activity data==== | ||
- | Activity data for this category are based on data from a step by step calculation: | + | Activity data for this category are based on data from a step by step calculation: |
- | ^ fire ^ resulting number | + | The following values are the result of evaluation: |
- | | easter fires et. | + | ^ Type of fire (quantity of wooden wastes) ^ Unit ^ 1990 ^ 1995 ^ 2000 ^ 2005 ^ 2010 ^ 2015 ^ 2016 ^ 2017 ^ 2018 ^ 2019 ^ 2020 |
- | | other open burning of wood | + | | All bonfires in sum | |
====Emission factors==== | ====Emission factors==== | ||
- | Emission factors | + | As discussed on Review 2020 regarding EF used and referenced: We use different EF from different |
- | ^ pollutant | + | |
- | | CO | 58.0 | GB 2016 small combustion Table 3-6: Tier 1 emission factors for NFR source category 1.A.4.b, using biomass | + | ^ pollutant |
- | | NOx | 0.9 | + | | CO |
- | | SO2 | 0.2 | + | | NOₓ |
- | | NMVOC | 47.0 | GB 2016 Forest fires, table 3-1, according 'wood burned' | + | | SO₂ |
- | | TSP | 17.0 | GB 2016 Forest fires, table 3-1, according 'wood burned' | + | | NMVOC | 47.0 | kg/ t | not correct used, error in data handling |
- | | PM10 | 11.0 | GB 2016 Forest fires, table 3-1, according 'wood burned' | + | | TSP | 17.0 |
- | | PM2.5 | 9.0 | + | | PM10 |
- | | BC | 0.81 | GB 2016 Forest fires, table 3-1, according 'wood burned' | + | | PM₂.₅ |
- | | PCDD/ | + | | BC |
- | | PAH | 0.00339 | sum of single compounts | + | | PCDD/ |
- | | BaP | 0.0013 | + | | PAH | 3.39 | g/ t | sum of single compounts |
- | | BbF | 0.0015 | + | | BaP | 1.3 | g/ t | IIR Ireland |
- | | BkF | 0.0005 | + | | BbF | 1.5 | g/ t | IIR Ireland |
- | | IxP | 0.00009 | Research results for charcoal | + | | BkF | 0.5 | g/ t | IIR Ireland |
- | | Pb | 0.32 g/ t | GB 2016 Forest fires, table 3-2 | + | | IxP | 0.09 |
- | | Cd | 0.13 g/ t | GB 2016 Forest fires, table 3-2 | + | | Pb |
+ | | Cd | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
===== Trends in emissions ===== | ===== Trends in emissions ===== | ||
- | All trends in emissions correspond to trends of AD. No rising trends are to identify. | + | All trends in emissions correspond to trends of AD. No rising trends are to identify. |
[{{: | [{{: | ||
===== Recalculations ===== | ===== Recalculations ===== | ||
- | With **activity data** and **emission factors** remaining unrevised, no recalculations have been carried out compared to last year's submission. | + | Due to evaluation of activity data recalculations have been carried out compared to last year's submission. Mainly the values of 2019 were changed, all other years only minor. |
<WRAP center round info 60%> | <WRAP center round info 60%> | ||
- | For pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2018, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following [[general: | + | For **pollutant-specific information on recalculated emission estimates for Base Year and 2019**, please see the pollutant specific recalculation tables following [[general: |
</ | </ | ||
+ |